- Support Home
- Horus updates
- FAQs
- Browsers and compatibility
- Registration
- Signing in and out
- Username and password
- Roles in Horus
- Menu options
- User management
- Foundation doctor photos
- Non-trainee grade (NTG)
- Data in Horus
- Rotations and placements
- Forms and functionality
- Creating content
- The curriculum
- Team assessment of behaviour (TAB)
- Mandatory certificates
- Mandatory teaching log
- e-Learning for Health
- Concerns management
- Placement supervision group (PSG) feedback
- Annual review of competence progression (ARCP)
- Reporting
- Communication in Horus
- Archived HEE e-portfolio
- Video Tutorials
- PDF User Guides
- Webinars
- About Horus
- Contact us
- Blank forms
- Glossary
- Useful links
- Sitemap
- Privacy Notice
- Technical Checker
Roles in Horus
-
Roles in Horus
-
What user roles are there in Horus?
User types
There are two types of user roles in Horus:
1. Foundation doctor (FD) (or NTG, who uses Horus to record their own competences)
2. Any other doctor (for example, a doctor who is a trainer) or other user (for example, a nurse or a postgraduate centre manager)Access types
Type 1 users have access to their own portfolio only.
Type 2 users can have the following types of permission (depending on where they work):
- Foundation School Director (FSD)
- Foundation School Manager (FSM)
- Foundation Programme Director (FPD)
- Administrator
- Trainer
- ARCP Panel MemberFSDs, FSMs, FPDs and admins have access to the portfolio of any FD/NTG who has placements at their location.
Trainers and ARCP panel members have access to the portfolio of any FD/NTG to whom they have been assigned as a supervisor/ARCP panel member.
Supervisor types
Type 2 users can be assigned to FDs/NTGs as any of four types of supervisor:
1. Academic supervisor
2. Clinical supervisor
3. Educational supervisor
4. Other supervisor (explain in free-text)Guidance on managing these roles is available in the "User management" section.
-
What does it mean to be a "trainer" in Horus?
A "trainer" in Horus is a type of user permission that allows the user:
- to be assigned to foundation doctors/NTGs as a supervisor
- to be asked by foundation doctors/NTGs to sign supervised learning events (SLEs) and core procedures
- This means that doctors more senior than F2, nurses, pharmacists, allied health professionals and other types of healthcare staff will be assigned the "trainer" permission in Horus
- to keep records of any forms they sign for foundation doctors/NTGs
This permission-type should not be confused with the "GP Trainer" accreditation, which is official terminology used in the GP Educator pathway facilitated by HEE local offices and NHS trusts.
-
UK Foundation Programme roles and responsibilities
-
What is a foundation doctor expected to do in the e-portfolio?
The Foundation Guide (2019) (p.65) states that:
5.1 Foundation doctors are expected to take control of their own learning and become fully involved in the educational, supervised learning and assessment processes of their foundation training.
5.2 Their responsibilities include:
[...]
• becoming familiar with the requirements for satisfactory completion of F1 and the foundation programme
• becoming fully involved in the educational, supervised learning and assessment processes, including attending core generic training sessions, meeting regularly with their educational and clinical supervisor and maintaining an up-to-date e-portfolio
[...]
The forms available in Horus specifically for the foundation doctor are:Career planning
Career planning - guidance
Course / seminar / other learning attended
Exam
Extra-curricular achievement
Form R F1
Form R F2
Health declaration
Interesting Case
Personal development plan (PDP)
PDP progress (self-evaluation)
Probity declaration
Procedure (non-core)
Publication
Quality Improvement
Reflection
Research
Self-TAB
Requirements for satisfactory completion of F1
Requirements for satisfactory completion of F2
Taster
Teaching others
-
What is an academic supervisor expected to do in the e-portfolio?
The Foundation Guide (2019) states that:
(p.17) 2.53 Foundation doctors in an academic foundation programme should also have an academic supervisor. The academic supervisor is responsible for overseeing a specified foundation doctor’s academic work and providing constructive feedback during an academic or related placement.
(p.59) 4.97 On entry to the AFP, the named academic supervisor should devise a research plan with the trainee as the context against which to assess their academic progress. The educational supervisor and named academic supervisor should work together to ensure that clinical and academic objectives are complementary. Both supervisors and the trainee should be aware of the trainee’s overall clinical and academic requirements.
4.98 The academic supervisor should submit a report to the Educational supervisor at the end of the academic placement, highlighting the AFP trainee’s achievements, strengths and areas for development. The Educational supervisor should use this report as evidence for their end of year report about the trainee, which will be used by the ARCP panel to recommend an outcome.
The forms available in Horus specifically for the academic supervisor are:
Academic Supervisor End of Placement Meeting Form
Academic Supervisor Initial Meeting Form
Academic Supervisor Mid Placement Meeting Form
-
What is a clinical supervisor expected to do in the e-portfolio?
The Foundation Guide (2019) states that:
(p.14) 2.43 The named clinical supervisor is responsible for collating evidence of the performance of a trainee whilst in a training placement, providing feedback to the trainee and working with the trainee and the educational supervisor to agree action plans to ameliorate any concerns or issues identified.
(p.16) 2.49 The educational supervisor and/or named clinical supervisor and trainee should discuss and be clear about the use of an e-portfolio. Regular help and advice should be available to the trainee to ensure that the portfolio is developed to support professional learning.
2.50 Records should be made on the trainee’s e-portfolio of these regular meetings, and these must be shared between trainee and educational supervisor or named clinical supervisor.
The forms available in Horus specifically for the clinical supervisor are:
Additional Action Plan
Clinical Supervisors End of Placement Report - no concerns to report
Clinical Supervisors End of Placement Report - concerns to report
Combined Induction Meeting with Clinical Supervisor & Initial Meeting with Educational Supervisor
Induction Meeting with Clinical Supervisor
Mid-placement review
Placement Supervision Group Individual Feedback Form
Placement Supervision Group Individual Feedback Form - no concerns (short version)
-
What is an educational supervisor expected to do in the e-portfolio?
The Foundation Guide (2019) states that:
(p.13) 2.41 The educational supervisor is responsible for collating evidence of the performance of a trainee whilst in a training programme, providing feedback to the trainee and agreeing action plans to ameliorate any concerns or issues identified.
(p.16) 2.49 The educational supervisor and/or named clinical supervisor and trainee should discuss and be clear about the use of an e-portfolio. Regular help and advice should be available to the trainee to ensure that the portfolio is developed to support professional learning.
2.50 Records should be made on the trainee’s e-portfolio of these regular meetings, and these must be shared between trainee and educational supervisor or named clinical supervisor.
The forms available in Horus specifically for the educational supervisor are:
Additional Action Plan
Combined Induction Meeting with Clinical Supervisor & Initial Meeting with Educational Supervisor
Curriculum progress rating
Educational Supervisors End of Placement Report F1
Educational Supervisors End of Placement Report F2
Educational Supervisor's End of Year Report F1
Educational Supervisor's End of Year Report F2
Initial Meeting with Educational Supervisor
Mid-placement review
Mid-year review of progress
TAB summary / sign-off form